Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack
being someone in the environmental field and currently getting a masters in biogeochemistry I hate to say it but the lawsuit is bullshit.
|
Ahh... still in school, and already you are an expert? Lets look at this for a minute.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack
Abestos as stated above takes large concentrations over a long period of time (decades not month) to have any major effect.
|
Asbestosis is not the only issue at hand. Mesothelioma, which occurs in the chest and abdominal cavities, is an aggressive disease with malignant cells derived from the mesothelium, a tissue found on the inner walls of the chest and abdominal cavities and on the outer surface of the lungs.
Many epidemiologists believe there is no risk threshold, and only minor exposure over a brief period can cause mesothelioma. Also, as noted on the National Cancer Institute website, prolonged exposure is a greater risk, but even brief encounters can cause asbestos related diseases.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/f.../Risk/asbestos
Aside from asbestosis and mesothelioma, asbestos is carcinogenic, and can cause lung cancer and gastrointestinal cancer. Asbestos has a synergistic effect with smoke inhalation, a risk firefighters face regularly.
So in short, you may wish to do a bit more research here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack
The ground zero health problems are primirily due to particulate matter not VOC or semiVOC which can be effectively filtered with the 99 cent dust masks sold at any local hardware store.
|
Polychlorinated biphenyls, not general volatile organic compounds. I was a bit more specific than that. Now, why don't you read what I said regarding masks.
If you remember anything about the duct tape & plastic fiasco, you might realize that perhaps there weren't many masks available at the time...
And of course, I was at Fresh Kills landfill, not shopping around at a hardware store. Since I was passed out the moment I got home, the same for so many others, we didn't exactly have time to go shopping.
Moving on...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack
Dioxins. I would love to see the data pertaining to the levels of exposure compared to the OSHA time weight averages of exposure.
|
Claimed in 2001 (ie, the lie): 0.1 f/cc, 8-hour time weighted average.
As was later released, the number was closer to between 200 and 1500 times that amount.
Dioxins can cause developmental abnormalities in the enamel of teeth, immune-system damage, endometriosis, birth defects, diabetes, and increased risk of liver and lung cancer. The effects of dioxins are cumulative, so repetitive minor exposure causes major health risks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack
Sorry but it's just another lawyer taking advantage of our sue happy society. Great your a firefighter I respect that but the fact is class actions suits give little money to the people they are for. They actually cost the working class in the long run because it either puts companies out of business or just raises costs on everyday items. It's like car insurance. If every jackass didn't sue anytime they got bumped we wouldn't be paying such outragous sums.
|
Except the lawsuit isn't about the money, its (for me) more about trying to get at those responsible for not informing us of the levels and the risk, and flat out lying instead. You think I give a shit about the money? I want to know this won't happen again, or worse, happen again and be much more dangerous conditions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack
I think next time you go into a burning building you should trip and fall and get hurt...then you can sue the building owner because there was a fire and you got hurt because of it.........YES I AM AN ASSHOLE
|
I probably shouldn't have bothered replying. Reading this, its obvious that you're not an asshole, you're just a fucking idiot.
I'd recommend a few more classes before you start giving out more "expert" advice, being that you're "in the environmental field" and all.