Thread: WW III......
View Single Post

Old 01-25-2007, 04:45 PM   #10
EuniceEstelle
Short Shifter
 
EuniceEstelle's Avatar
 
EuniceEstelle is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jersey City (Journal Sq)
Posts: 128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCSTRIPES View Post
You can't have it both ways. When the US sits aside, the UN pushes for the US military to intervene and make their resolutions hold water by backing them with military force.
US Carrier groups are a show of diplomatic and military force.
sure, but having the UN beg the US to do something connotates differently from the US's blatant display of power in taking world relations into our own hands. i think the US should sit back and turtle up instead of going out and making the first tactical moves that will set the scene for other countries to respond in kind. then at least we are not the ones initiating the attacks and put ourselves in a potential target situation. when the UN begs the US to do something, THEN we get our foot in the door, as moderator, not as attacker. ultimately the same results would be achieved, just with better ramifications.
__________________

www.2WheelAffair.com
THE ULTIMATE MOTORCYCLE PARTY SHOW 2007

ADD ME!!:
www.myspace.com/2wheelaffair



Never trade the thrills of living for the security of existence.

There are two types of people in this world, people who ride motorcycles and people who wish they could ride motorcycles.

Everyone crashes. Some get back on. Some don't. Some can't.
  Reply With Quote